Add 'Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do'

Employment-Lawyer-Discusses-what-Trump-Offer-to-Federal-Employees-to-Resign-Would-Do.md

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+<br>MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal staff members have till February 6 to decide whether to willingly leave their [jobs](https://www.cittamondoagency.it). The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, notified employees on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday - that's less than a week from now - most will be allowed to take leave and be paid until completion of September. Michelle Bercovici is a work legal representative who represents federal workers as a large part of her practice, so I asked her for her interpretation about what OPM's postponed resignation program would really mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I really don't consider it so much a deal. I believe it's a demand  [employment](https://wiki.team-glisto.com/index.php?title=Benutzer:Mira694036) to resign with an unclear pledge that, possibly, you might be kept in administrative leave status for up to eight months - but no guarantees.MARTIN: Some individuals have been using the term buyout to explain what this is since there appears to be the deal of administrative leave for approximately eight months if you take this offer. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would definitely not describe it as a buyout. I believe that's a really deceptive term to utilize in this circumstance. When you think about a buyout, there's normally some sort of composed contract or a concrete deal to offer an [advantage](https://calciojob.com) in exchange for waiving certain rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If clients ask you for your recommendations, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: First thing we inform them is workout extreme caution. There are no assurances included in this e-mail. The only thing I can tell you for particular is that if you change your mind, the agency's most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are essentially quiting control over a lot.MARTIN: Exists some classification of employee who you believe this might benefit? Maybe they're close to retirement. Is somebody like that might this be an [appealing offer](https://saghurojobs.com)?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement require to be the most mindful since leaving earlier than meant can have major consequences, possibly, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White [House press](https://jobs.web4y.online) secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She told press reporters that this is a good offer for individuals who do not want to go back to the workplace. Let me simply play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a suggestion to federal workers that they have to return in - to work. And if they do not, then they have the option to resign, and this [administration](http://calm-shadow-f1b9.626266613.workers.dev) is extremely generously providing to pay them for eight months.MARTIN: You're shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It just - in a method, it breaks my heart that federal workers are being jerked around like this. It sends out a signal to me that this return-to-office order remains in bad faith, that it's designed to get folks who work truly hard to resign. I believe it's attempting to pull the wool over a great deal of people's eyes due to the fact that there are no warranties. And these are people who enjoy their [job](https://palsyworld.com). They love the objective of the company. They work hard. And today, they're dealing with extremely difficult options, specifically if they're remote. I suggest, it's extremely coercive.MARTIN: You state it's coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you're somebody who resides in Oregon and has been informed to report to D.C. otherwise we're going to fire you,  [employment](https://wiki.team-glisto.com/index.php?title=Benutzer:ClarissaDettmann) they might feel that they have no choice than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you expect legal difficulties just to the offer itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This deal, to be truthful, is so unprecedented that I think a great deal of us are still trying to determine what to do with it. I'm not exactly sure if the deal itself may be challengeable. I believe the bigger concern is the execution of these terms. I'm not familiar with any authority that exists right now for OPM to purchase companies to provide this number of individuals administrative leave. So I think it is very much perhaps setting the phase for difficulties because I feel OPM has greatly surpassed their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is an [employment](http://printworksstpete.com) legal representative with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you a lot for signing up with us.BERCOVICI: Thank you so much for having me here.<br>
+<br>Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights booked. Visit our site regards to use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for more details.<br>
+<br>NPR records are produced on a rush due date by an . This text might not be in its final type and may be upgraded or modified in the future. Accuracy and availability might vary. The authoritative record of NPR's programs is the audio record.<br>