bodyandmindblog

For Christmas I got an intriguing gift from a friend - my extremely own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a few simple triggers about me provided by my pal Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and extremely funny in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of composing, however it's likewise a bit recurring, and very verbose. It may have surpassed Janet's prompts in collecting data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, since rotating from putting together AI -generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to generate them, based on an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who created it, can buy any further copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone creating one in any person's name, including stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, created by AI, trademarketclassifieds.com and developed "entirely to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is intended as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get sold even more.

He intends to broaden his variety, creating different categories such as sci-fi, and maybe providing an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - offering AI-generated items to human consumers.

It's likewise a bit frightening if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to create, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable content based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are discussing information here, we in fact mean human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is images. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI -generated voices of Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think making use of generative AI for creative purposes must be prohibited, however I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without approval should be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very effective but let's build it ethically and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually picked to block AI designers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI designers to use developers' content on the web to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders choose out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is likewise highly against removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of delight," says the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening among its finest carrying out markets on the unclear guarantee of growth."

A federal government representative stated: "No relocation will be made till we are definitely confident we have a practical plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for right holders to help them certify their material, access to top quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI plan, a national information library including public information from a large range of sources will likewise be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to improve the security of AI with, among other things, firms in the sector required to share details of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is said to want the AI sector to face less regulation.

This comes as a variety of claims versus AI firms, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their authorization, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of elements which can make up reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training data and whether it need to be paying for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to ponder, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its innovation for a fraction of the rate of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I think that at the moment, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weakness in generative AI tools for larger projects. It is complete of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be rather hard to check out in parts because it's so verbose.

But given how quickly the tech is developing, I'm not exactly sure how long I can remain confident that my significantly slower human writing and modifying skills, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in global innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters around the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.