rackons

Our brand-new Deepseek-based AI states "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl predictions from our brand-new Deepseek-based AI trained to be much better at forecasting

Share this post

No one can anticipate the future however at Lightning Rod Labs we are training AI to offer it its finest shot. With up to date news and a little but lively 14 Billion specification design, our AI is boldly forecasting the unpredictable. Join us as we attempt to answer humanity's hardest concerns.

Super Bowl Sunday is almost upon us and, classicalmusicmp3freedownload.com simply as two years earlier, elclasificadomx.com we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the stats are well studied, there remain numerous pressing questions that are less simple to select. Our business, Lightning Rod Labs, has actually been mining concerns from locations like polymarket.com and training a big language design to be much better at anticipating the future (and have actually seen some interesting improvements - term paper incoming). Today we turned its cold, calculating eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can provide us some insight into the finer points of what we can anticipate this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world sign up for my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion specification model which is in fact on the smaller side. (Some price quotes recommend ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION parameters and trained using 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, its understanding cutoff is from many months earlier so we have actually constructed an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each question we offer the news and watch as the AI reasons its way through unknown territory to make its best forecast possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We posed the following questions to our AI and evaluated its response. While we have seen prediction improvements from our training, use these price quotes for prop wagering at your own danger.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% chance

Therefore it appears this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI thinks Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock strong, however a little too private for a post-Super Bowl proposition. Plus got ta factor in if the Chiefs lose. That would be an uncomfortable proposition ...

First, I'll look at the bottom lines from the short articles. Travis has remained in a relationship with Taylor given that 2023. He's a huge football star, and she's been supportive of his profession, attending his video games. They appear to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has even invited her good friends and family to the Super Bowl, revealing her dedication.

Some fans are delighted, while others, particularly Swifties, are a bit uncertain, particularly given comments Travis made about Donald Trump going to the Super Bowl. That has caused some Swifties to question how ideal Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple seems to be keeping their relationship private and not dealing with the speculation straight.

I believe the bottom lines are the speculation and his incredibly elusive responses. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is a crucial occasion, the odds and his actions suggest it's more of a possibility rather than a certainty. I 'd approximate a low likelihood, possibly around 5%, considering all factors.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the super bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% chance

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from using their signature "tush-push" move, now its simply a various front-tush being pushed. Will an AI comprehend what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even understand what a "tush" is? Will it factor in that the Chiefs stopped (controversy aside) Josh Allen's similar efforts? Looks like our AI thinks they'll be utilizing Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again throughout this game.

Alright, I'm trying to figure out the likelihood that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the Super Bowl. First, I require to comprehend what exactly a "tush-push" is. From the short articles, it looks like it's a method where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, utilizes his legs and lower body strength to press off defenders. It's compared to pushing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that requires strength and method.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts uses his leg strength, having actually done a 600-pound squat, to execute the relocation. The article discusses that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this method, which is pretty high. ... I also require to believe about the protective techniques of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs understand the Eagles' "tush-push" method, they may change their defense appropriately, which might either increase or reduce the number of times the Eagles use it.

Considering that more than five appears like a substantial number but possible given their confidence, I would estimate a possibility around 60-70% chance. This represents their preparation, confidence in the technique, and the possibility that they'll utilize it several times, especially if it works early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump during the halftime program performance?

AI Final Prediction: 65% chance

While our AI may not be like us when it pertains to awareness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has viewpoints on Kendrick Lamar. It was pretty uncertain, waffling backward and forward, however in the end it believes Kendrick isn't going to back down from a battle.

From the short articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of slamming Trump. He's done this in his songs, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a declaration throughout a previous halftime show when Trump was present in 2018. That appears significant due to the fact that it shows he's done it previously, so maybe he'll do it again. But wait, taking a look at more current posts, it points out that Lamar is moving far from political statements and focusing more on personal expression. That might indicate he's less most likely to attend to Trump this time.

However, he's likewise associated with a feud with Drake, which might provide him factors to make some public statements, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal concerns surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a disparagement fit from Drake, so perhaps he bewares about consisting of any questionable tunes in the performance. But given that he won the Grammys for that track, he may still desire to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a prominent event, Lamar might feel forced to make a declaration. However, the NFL tends to prevent political declarations throughout the halftime show, so there's a risk that such material might be limited or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a performance history of making vibrant carry on huge stages. He's the very first solo rap act to heading the halftime show, which might offer him more imaginative freedom. Plus, his past habits recommends he's not shy about expressing his viewpoints, even in public efficiencies.

But I also remember reading that Lamar revealed fatigue about criticizing Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That could indicate he's less encouraged to raise Trump this time around, particularly if he's concentrating on his feud with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past behavior, present shifts in focus, legal concerns, and the event's context-the possibility appears to be moderately high, perhaps around 65%.

Will Andy Reid consume a on screen after the incredibly bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% possibility

Lets be truthful, Andy Reid enjoys cheeseburgers. And who does not? Will the truth that our AI has never ever tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its forecast? Looks like theres somewhat of a possibility that if the chiefs taste victory, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the short articles, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid eating a cheeseburger during a Super Bowl celebration. Bradshaw later on said sorry for the joke, stating he didn't imply to trigger offense which he really found it humorous himself. Reid appeared to take it in stride, which may indicate he's the type to laugh it off rather than getting upset.

Taking a look at the posts, it points out that Andy Reid is a food lover and likes cheeseburgers. There's a post particularly about his love for food, which recommends that he's a person who delights in eating, especially with his group. So, if there were strategies to celebrate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would partake in a cheeseburger, opentx.cz particularly if the situation is on screen for a celebration.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% chance

"Tails never ever fails?" You can't trick the machines !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have been anticipating the coin toss and 53% are forecasting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 super bowls. Potentially rewarding? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be tricked and thinks anything can happen when that coin enters the air.

Okay, so I'm attempting to determine the probability that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I know that a coin toss is expected to be 50/50, however there's some historic information that may influence this forecast.

First, I check out through the posts provided. They all point out the historical data of Super Bowl coin tosses. It appears like tails has come up more frequently than heads historically. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has actually been the outcome 30 times, which is about 52%, while heads has been 28 times, which is about 48%. So, based simply on history, tails has a slight edge, however it's not a substantial difference.

However, I remember that the result of a coin toss is generally considered random. The slight historical edge for tails might be due to possibility. But when making predictions, in some cases people weigh historical information even if it's not statistically considerable. So, I should think about whether this historic bias should influence the possibility.

After thinking about it, I choose that while the historic data shows a small choice for tails, it's not statistically significant enough to move the possibility away from 0.5. So, I'll choose 0.5 as the likelihood, acknowledging that the slight historical edge exists however doesn't override the fact that each toss is an independent 50/50 occasion.

Will the referees cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% chance

We get it, you believe the refs like Patrick Mahomes and asteroidsathome.net are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I guarantee we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training information) I would probably think the exact same. BUT, its authorities now due to the fact that our AI states the possibilities are just 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still sort of high when it pertains to fraud on a national scale). Looks like the Chiefs will need to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I'm trying to find out the possibility that the referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a quite severe allegation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a lot of articles that discuss conspiracy theories recommending referees are prejudiced towards the Chiefs. People are indicating some questionable calls in current video games, particularly the AFC Championship Game. That does appear to spark some uncertainty. I can see why fans might get irritated when their team loses due to what they perceive as bad officiating.

But then I check out that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "unbelievable" and "ridiculous." They say there's no evidence of methodical predisposition. That's a strong declaration from the people in charge. If they're rejecting it, it might imply there's no real basis or they would have addressed it in a different way if there was some truth to it.

Looking at the posts, several sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the authorities are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They likewise mentioned that statistical analysis does not reveal any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For example, Mike Pereira from FOX said data shows the Chiefs have been penalized more since 2022. That's intriguing since if they were getting unique treatment, you might anticipate less penalties, right?

...

So, putting it all together, the probability that referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is probably extremely low. Maybe not zero since you can't dismiss every possibility, but incredibly unlikely.

Summary

There you have it everybody, is it even worth enjoying the video game still? I think I'll need to wait and see how the game turns out before we unleash this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for an excellent game! And hey, if it ends up our AI was wrong about everything, at least it can gain from this.